everything is DIFFERENT so its not an issue to divide in classic alternative ect
the basic in figure modelling is simple try to come as close to an original as you can...and any aspect wich delivering this is not different its partof an hobby and brings results.
this is not stock figure showing this is HIGH PROFESSIONAL MODELLING so who cares it its differnt,,the RESULTS are not to meet woth paints alone..
so it i vote for the how close is this to the real thing i say the level is higher that this only painting can deliver.... real cloth is cloth not painted surface...BUT who cares i know what he delivers in his works but i have tried to alter this figures as well...and my results are lousy...so i have no big say in an compendium of artists...of course not.
but again paint as nice you want you will not reach this level with your results because the eye can not be fooled and overlook real garments hairs ect...
so at end if you vote for REALISM the result is clear and might be the reason for some brushers scorn or concerns or resentiments...right
if you state that this artform should have no bigger part in an classic painting forum its an issue...therefore i did not post to many of my low attempts because it was cleat to me that it is regarded as doll crap by many.....
but thats totally normal there is everywhere an rooster of inferior to superior and why could it be not in the hobby as well..
so thats all in my oppinion and as low class modeller i am an paria under masters
neverless iam right in this matter
you can not match such masterly done 1 to 6 dioramas with anything painted up....in aspects of REALISM
in other aspects like artistry ect we talk different.