Thanks for the input.

We have decided to make a change to reviews in future.

Stuart

Not Martin? Will SM gear still be on that page?

I suspect not PF.....don't entirely blame them.

Review - as far as I understand the word - means an inspection of pro`s and con`s of a subject. Nevertheless there is the word "view" hidden in it and so the personal view of the writer (or reviewer ) is naturally involved.
I always appreciate good pics and sometimes they are contradictive to the accompanying text in my view. In this case I still appreciate the time and effort somebody else took to "open the box" for me.
I don`t see a problem with a one-sided ultra-positive text next to good pictures that allow me to come to my own conclusions and on the other hand don`t feel that PF has become such a bad place. It´s a hobby and we should get along with each other. My two cents.
Cheers, Martin

As I painter of this figure I like to hear critics I guess is the same for the sculptor, but in my personal opinion a critic should come next with a possible solution according with the person who do the critics, I mean, not all critics comment has to be negative and leave it there, I think is better first to say the critic and then a solution or possible solution in a positive way to fix what he consider a mistake.
Remember that this is a subjective art, cause all art is subjective (some people like it some others don't). Please next time that someone say a critic about a figure please also comment about a solution to fix what he consider an error.